« February 2008 | Main | April 2008 »

March 28, 2008

Christopherus Curriculum: Update

I wrote the following for the February issue of our e-mail newsletter and realized that it would be good to share this information on the blog too! This is a progress report concerning the new Christopherus Curriculum.

Second and Third Grade

We’re right on schedule with the new second and third grade curriculums. I am so pleased with them I could burst – and I really think that if you like our other materials you will be thrilled with them: they are deeper; contain more step-by step instructions for artistic work; and are more user-friendly, more doable and more complete than anything we’ve produced yet! I have just finished our two third grade Native American blocks. I have given full lesson material so that you can share beautiful living pictures of the People of the Desert, People of Snow and Ice, People of the Woodlands, People of the Swamps, People of the Rice, People of the Plains and People of Water and Mist with your child. The theme for third grade is Practical Work – and the main thrust of the Native American main lessons is how the people lived – how they lived in harmony with their environments and how the different ways the different people hunted, farmed and built their homes was/is an expression of this. Thus part of the Building theme for third grade finds expression in an exploration of how different Native American peoples lived/live and built their homes.

Building is also picked up again in two Practical Work main lessons where I suggest a host of practical building projects. Measuring, the main topic for third grade math, is presented and then picked up again through practical building work. And creating a Three Sisters Garden comes out of the Native American main lessons and is a large part of the practical work in the latter part of third grade.

Weather is the main science topic for third grade (see here for more on how we have developed our Christopherus science curriculum for all 8 grades) and is woven into a number of lessons as well as its own mini main lessons.

So you can see how the third grade curriculum in particular is really one integrated whole (there’s more than I have mentioned here as well). This is one reason why we have only made one component of the third grade curriculum available separately (Old Testament Stories) as opposed to three in second grade (Animal Legends, Saints & Heroes, Second Grade Math).

Please see here for a simple overview of our second and third grade curriculums and here for answers to Frequently Asked Questions about the new curriculum).


Fourth and Fifth Grade

The fourth grade curriculum lends itself more easily to being split into components and we will probably have at least two main lessons available separately (Fourth Grade Math at the end of the summer or early fall and then Man & Animal at some later point.) We also plan to have a fifth grade Ancient Myths book available (perhaps early 2009) to join the fifth grade Botany which is already available.

At some point after the third and second grade curriculums are available, we will have a page up on our website to help homeschoolers bridge the current gaps in our curriculum. This will be a How to Put Together Fourth Grade page similar to the current How to Put Together Second Grade page. Parents of 2008/09 fourth graders will have our fifth grade curriculum ready for them when they need it! And then the intention is to start producing the middle years curriculum.

Sixth through Eighth Grade

At the moment my thoughts on that are to put together 6th – 8th grade books by subject so that parents can customize, depending on the needs of their middle years children. In other words, we will, most likely, have Middle Years Math, Middle Years Science and Middle Years Language Arts books (this latter volume being the second in the series of Living Language Language Arts books, the grades 1 through 5 already available).. These will be joined by a selection of various main lesson books (like the current Roman History and Middle Ages unit studies) so that there is a lot of flexibility in how one sequences the work. In our Waldorf Curriculum Overview I discuss how the middle years curriculum is much more fluid than the earlier years curriculum and how one can work with that at home. Anyway…. more on this later next year!

March 24, 2008

A Question of Control

Here's a somewhat reworked piece that I wrote on my forum in response to a member wondering whether she was being too controlling of her children. She has three little girls - a pair of twins and another child, all under 5. Her children demand that she bring things to them - and then reject what she brings. They say what they want to do all day long - and she finds herself following them.
 
I don't think you are being too controlling - I would even gently suggest you are not being controlling enough!

Your children are too little to be "told" that books shouldn't be ripped - they must learn by example. And so I would suggest that books live on a high shelf and only come down when you are looking at the books with them - and you are holding the book and guiding how it is looked at. Our precious books lived on a high shelf until my youngest was about 5 or 6. After that, they knew how to handle precious things. Books are not junk to be torn and drawn on - they have beautiful stories in them.  So much of what one wants to do out of Waldorf has to do with cultivating a feeling of reverence in the soul of the child - and to create the right mood for learning. Allowing children to destroy things only destroys such feelings and never allows the right mood to develop. To allow a child to destroy is to allow something within that child to be destroyed. Exuberance is one thing - destructive behavior is another. But.... at this age it cannot be left to the child to determine how to act. And so the mother must create (or control if you will) the environment and help the children learn. No child comes to earth understanding how to live as a human being - this is something we must  start to learn as children (and continue to refine all our adult lives!)  and is the most important lesson of all. It is a major reason why I am so in favor of homeschooling - because the family is the right place for such lessons to unfold. For some children such lessons are learned slowly - others really do seem to already know how to act.
 
Out in the garden the children can mash and build and destroy in the sandbox - no harm is done. But they need to learn to not hurt plants and animals - and can never be assumed to know how to do this when they are under 5 or 6 - or even older for some (especially those who have impulse control issues). "Look at this lovely tree - let's watch how the wind dances with the leaves" - no moralizing ("you must not rip tree leaves"). Speak to what lives in the child's soul - the innate sense of Oneness.  To be One is to completely empathize with the Other - including if the Other is a tree. Thus is laid the moral foundations for life.

As for puzzles, I would suggest you thank your friend warmly - and put them away.. No tiny child needs 15 puzzles! This creates the kind of "more, more, more" situation which, again, is absolutely counter to what one wants to achieve! I would also gently suggest that you think long and hard about having  any puzzles for such tiny children anyway. A puzzle has one right way to be done. One has to develop a kind of linear thinking to complete a puzzle which is totally at odds with the kind of free flowing picture-based thinking that should be allowed to live in very young children. Logic and linear thinking are great - but they are the domain of much older children and adults. Tiny children  should not be pushed into acquiring this kind of thinking until it unfolds naturally, when they are ripe.

Back to your relationship to your children's play, Forum Member X -  I would never get into "bringing the children" their entertainments - you do your work and that's that. On occasion you could find times to play with them or read to them. Otherwise they follow you around - and if they don't join in, then they can get their things themselves. You could have a special time when you are involved  with them doing things like cutting up, drawing etc. Otherwise it's dollies and blocks and the few other things they have free access to. Everything else comes out only when you are involved and you are carrying the situation. (and when Mama is having a rest that is also not a time for fetching and carrying - they are not too young to start to learn that).

You are not there to fetch and carry for your children - remember - it's child inclusive, not child centered!! This is a huge difference! And with three tiny ones, I strongly suggest you consider what that means and implement it before you become exhausted!!

You do - they join in or are in your aura, your place of work. You create, carry, transform, and ensoul the home. They learn via your actions and your mood. This stage will not last - but if you want the years to follow to run smoothly I strongly suggest you turn things around and make sure that you do - and they follow. Then they will have a template as it were to build upon - they will know that "this is how we look at books;" "this is where the toys live;"  "this is what Mommy does and what we do"- not because of your words and their premature choices and so-called freedoms.... but because what you have done is imprinted upon them. This is just what the article (we read on the Forum)  by Michaela Glockler is about. Morality (which can be understood as a sociable way of living with other human beings) comes through activity in the young child, from her having her parent (or teacher) work in the right way with her, establishing what is good, true and beautiful. Then she can work on that herself as she grows older. When real freedom and choice start to appear at adolescence then she won't flounder - she has something upon which to build and to push off from, to find her own individuality and real freedom.

So rein those little girls back in! Set up just a few select things they can play with - and find ways to engage them in your work. No choices - "We are in the bathroom now - let's fill the tub with bubbles and you scrub the walls". It is no wonder they prefer to draw - they are seeing whether you will give them what they ask for. This is interesting - Mommy says she wants us to help her in the kitchen - but when we say we want to draw she gives in.... This sounds like manipulation - but it's not. But it is the way that little children learn about the world, themselves and the adults around them. They need to test and they need to learn where you begin and end and where they begin and end.
 
 If all of this makes sense to you and is the way you now wish to work with your children,  don't expect your relationship with them to transform overnight! They will perhaps scream or fuss or refuse. That's fine. You carry on - there's no harm in the children having a fuss when they don't want to do something. You just carry on. Reach out to them from your heart as you continue with your tasks about the house - be at peace and do not get into their "stuff". This is not about you . It is about three tiny little children learning and growing - and throw out any AP notions you might have that some crying is harmful for children of their age. It is not - it is how they learn. Do not feel you have failed your children if they cry. They are not babies lying alone in a crib at night - they are toddlers and young children learning to deal with their frustrations and pain - and learning how to be social and part of a family.
 
 At their age they are entering the most powerfully compelling time of imitation  which comes to the fore at about 5 years of age - trust in that. Just keep on scrubbing that tub and perhaps do something interesting like starting to whisper a story. Chances are they will have to quiet down because they will be interested to hear what you are saying - and then they will forget about screaming. However.... as two of them are twins, this could take a long time as they might support and reinforce each other. But don't give up! You don't want 7 year old twins who are demanding and refuse to do as you ask! As horrible as that could be for you, it could be 100% worse for them. No child wants to be unpleasant to be with.
__________________

March 18, 2008

Waldorf in Sierra Leone

Just recently I found out about a Waldorf school in Sierra Leone. A friend mentioned she had met a teacher from there who was on the same Waldorf teacher training course as she. I had no idea that there were any Waldorf schools outside South Africa, Kenya and Botswana. The situation in Sierra Leone is unbelievably difficult - the children at the school are mainly orphans, many of them having lost their parents to AIDS and to warfare. Many of the children themselves were pressed into being child soldiers and through the health bearing impulse of Waldorf are starting to heal. But it's a long haul in such an impoverished country.
 
A number of individuals and communities, including several Waldorf schools, are helping to support this school. My old school, the Rudolf Steiner School in NYC, has sent a teacher for a year. If you go to the Sierra Leone school's website, you can find her blog. And you can find out all about the children and the dedicated people who are running this school.
 
If anyone is inspired by this work, please help them out! And let us know what you do so we can spread the word!

[Please see my update to this post.]
 
 

8th Grade World History

A couple of months ago I got a phone call from the 8th grade teacher at our local Waldorf school - she was exhausted (as most th grade Waldorf teachers are) and was there any way I could come and do a short two week mini main lesson with her class? We talked a bit about what they had been doing and what she thought they needed and what would take me the least amount of preparation (main lessons don't just come tumbling off one's sleeve at short notice!). We decided that what would be best was if I taught a main lesson in World Geography.
 
The block went brilliantly - the students were a great group - the quality of their listening and the level of their engagement spoke highly of their class teacher's wonderful work with them as a group over the years. And they were just ripe for what I had to offer - their heads were full of thoughts of high school and though I have recently resigned from the slightly Waldorf inspired high school in town, they saw me as a High School teacher. And that's pretty much what I brought them - high school content. I was very aware of their journey through the Waldorf curriculum - and through a large, sweeping look at world geography and history (with lots of politics and economics thrown in) I aimed to revisit places and events they had covered throughout the grades and help them see the connections on a world scale.
 
As a high school teacher, whether I am teaching history, social studies or literature, I tend to move very fast and to make grand sweeping narratives through my material. For the 8th grade, I took them on a journey which started with looking at the earth as a whole, as an integrated, living, cohesive unity. They had just had a main lesson on meteorology so they were familiar with the Earth's weather patterns. We started with this and then looked at the expression of the Earth in terms of biomes and in terms of the formation of land masses and the relationship between land and water on a global scale.
 
We began with a Goethean exercise, looking at a map of the Earth (one without political boundaries), just describing what we saw. They described the land and the prevalence of water.... then they noticed that there was more land and less water in the Northern Hemisphere. After a bit they also noticed that there is a pattern across the globe of a massing in the north and a thinning down into peninsulas and/or islands to the south of each land mass. There is also usually an island off to the East of most land masses. Have a look at a world map yourself and have a look! We discussed whether there was indeed aa "right way up" for the map and was East really East or a Western notion (why then do the Japanese call their country the Land of the Rising Sun if the concepts East and West have no substance?!).
 
We then found the equator and looked at how there was a mirroring of ice at either pole and a wide band of tropical rain forest across the middle of the globe. We looked at savannahs and deciduous forests, at deserts and grasslands. I described each in detail - the plants, the animals, the weather. How did/do people live in these various biomes?
 
Over the course of the first week we gradually moved inward toward detail - from looking at the Earth as a whole, we moved into looking at continents and areas. We brought in human beings. How did/does geography effect human beings? We looked at the differences between hunter-gatherers and city dwellers. Why were the first great cities on plains? Why did the Nile as well as the Tigress and Euphrates become the birthing places of great civilizations? Why was the Mediterranean so important - then we came upon trade. How does geography effect trade - and what is trade anyway? We discussed what resources are and what was important to people long ago. We looked at the horse as a living form of technology - we jumped over to North America and discussed the fact that there were no horses here until the Spaniards came. How did the horse change the lives of the people here?
 
Back to Eurasia and back several thousand years - what great technological invention completely changed the way people lived? The wheel. We talked about wells and pulleys and chariots. We talked about how people living on plains could use chariots or ride on horseback whilst people in mountains or thick jungles would use the horse less. Where did various invaders come from? Then we went back and marvelled at the fact that the builders of the pyramids had no wheel. Neither did the Aztecs. The Romans had wheels. And they built straight roads. What is the effect on the land and on people when roads are straight as opposed to curving with the landscape?
 
We returned to the concept of resources. We looked at a modern political map and discussed resources and inventions. What great inventions followed the wheel? We talked about the printing press. What did it mean for people's lives that they could easily communicate ideas through the written word? Is trade just about material resources? We looked at the spread of ideas - of the ideas of the Greeks that traveled with the Muslim world to Spain and was safe guarded and expanded there. And then was taken up again in Renaissance Europe. How did ideas get from one place to another? We looked at the spread of religion - at Christianity and Islam. We looked at Judaism - here was something different - what was different? What was the Diaspora - why did it happen? What was the effect on a people who could not own land (in Europe) or join certain  trades?
 
 What about China? We talked about the Silk Route, about the spread of Buddhism, about the contact between China and Europe. We jumped ahead and looked at Japan. Here is an island. Western contact came in the form of Jesuits and traders - then the Japanese rejected influence from the West and closed their doors for two hundred years! The students were amazed by this - what could that mean? What importance did that have for the Japanese people and their culture? And what wasthe significance of the fact that Japan is an island?
 
Then we whizzed over to another island, to Britain. First we discussed what exactly "Great Britain" is and when that title came about - we got a bit side tracked discussing Ireland (here's another island) and then got back to England/Great Britain. We talked about how a heavily wooded island ("oh, you mean Sherwood Forest!") came to be a much less wooded island in part because of the need for wood to build..... ships! What was the after-effect of the Armada? One piece was that Britain became the dominant naval power of the world. Before launching into a discussion of colonialism and imperialism, we side stepped to consider the fact that the Chinese had at one time had the greatest naval fleet at one point with enormously sophisticated ships which dwarfed the European ships both in size and technological sophistication. But.... the Emperor commanded that the Celestial Empire had no need of exploring the rest of the world - and the ships were destroyed.
 
Back to Britain. We picked up on threads from the Spanish and Portuguese explores - what were they looking for? Gold and souls. We talked about their impact on the "New World"  (and what did this term mean - New to whom?). We considered how ideas were not the only thing that people spread as they traveled across the globe. We spent time discussing disease - went back and looked at the Plague in Europe and how it contributed to the end of feudalism and thus the end of the concept that people were chattel which could be acquired along with land. That of course led into a discussion about slavery and about the differences between slavery in the New World and in the Old. Back to our land theme, I shared with them the story of the cotton gin and how slavery might just have died out if Eli Whitney hadn't made this invention. This bowled them over! And that dovetailed neatly into a discussion of the beginnings of modern globalisation and capitalism - the cotton was grown by the slaves here in the "New World", taken to Britain to be spun into cloth by the workers in the mills (and I gave them a picture of what the mills were like - and again, with this theme of the relationship to land, talked about the enclosures and how agricultural practices changed and how one effect was to drive people off the land - and into the mills and coal mines) and then often shipped back to be sold to Americans! And picking up again on the land and resources - what was now needed? What great invention came about? The steam engine - and that needed coal and it needed iron and steel. And Britain had all these things plus easy access to trade routes via water. Enter the birth of the Industrial Revolution.
 
And thus we came full circle, back to our original picture of the Earth as a whole. We knew that the environment is a whole - if factories in the US Midwest pollute the air then the forests in Canada will suffer. We saw that trade was international - we spent some time talking about China and why everything in Walmart is made there. We dipped into economic theories - mobile workforces and capital, free markets, state intervention, labor theory of value.  Many of the students' parents are organic farmers - why all the fuss about eating local food? And then we had to look at Fair Trade issues, too.... and what are the shortcomings in a global capitalist economy? We looked at industries like fishing in the North sea - how do Canada, Iceland, the UK and Denmark come to agreements about fishing rights? How are the fish effected? What are the economic, social and ecological consequences? What happens when a people's way of life is dependent on something like fishing?
 
Well.... that's only a glimpse at what we covered. And the students loved it - poised on the threshold of a new stage of life, they were so eager to step into the world and try to understand some of these concepts. I took great care to try to emphasize that while there was a lot of destruction and horror in this picture that we had looked at together, that the point now is that people have the capacity to not be agents of destruction on the earth but to be co creators in positive growth and change. One worried student shared that she knew that some people thought the earth would be better off without human beings. We talked about this - most of the students thought that somehow this wasn't right, that human beings were a part of the order of life, though their capacities were obviously different from that of the natural world. I was relieved to hear them affirm this.
 
Because it was such a short block, I required very little homework. They had one 2 -3 page paper to write. I wanted them to examine the positive and negative effects people had had in specific geographical places and what the relevance of the geography was to what took place as well as the political and social implications. They chose from the Panama Canal; the Suez Canal; the Boll Weevil and Cotton in the US South; Lake Baikal in Russia; and the Dust Bowl in the US. Most of them wrote very good papers which showed that they understood that geography, the environment, politics and social life are all connected.
 
I hope you enjoy reading this - I certainly enjoyed sharing it with the students! In class, of course, I  paused often to make sure they were with me as we galloped across the stage of world history and across the globe itself! I tend to see my teaching as weaving - I move strongly forward with a theme - then double back and pick up any loose ends. Then I return again and again in subsequent days to look once again at what we talked about - but with students of this age, not to just recapitulate, but to deepen and to explore from another angle.
 
 

More on CA Homeschoolers Ruling

Just to follow up a bit on this.... this blog entry caused quite a flurry of discussion on my internet discussion forum. Many people were concerned about ramifications for their own states and there was also some concern about exactly what the CA ruling did or did not do. It seems that I was not 100% clear in what I wrote originally in my blog - I did not mean to imply that the judge in question made a new ruling. He did not. What I meant to point out was that he did bring forward or underline the fact that one can interpret the CA law to say that homeschoolijng is illegal. Prior to the case in question, homeschooling was (and perhaps will continue to be - it remains to be seen) a grey area. Most homeschoolers register through Charter schools or in one of a number of various ways.
 
The point of my blog entry was to highlight that the atmosphere toward homeschooling could be changing in CA - and that this has important implications for all of us. Despite the fact that Gov. Schwarteneggar has recently spoken in favor of homeschooling I know from my work with Christopherus that charter schools in CA are, in many ways, less open to parents actually determining what their children's educational needs are. And to me, that is what homeschooling is about.
 
All comments on this important issue are most welcome!

March 07, 2008

Helping Little Ones with Manners

Here's another reworked post from our Waldorf at Home discussion forum.... If this is a topic which interests you, do consider purchasing my talks on Good Manners and on Talking Pictorially to Young Children for more practical help with this! The following is my response to a post from a member who asked a number of questions about what she should expect from her children (under 5 years of age) in various social situations.
 
 
I think it's right to want one's children to be pleasant to be with - and I wish all parents thought about that! There are a lot of folks out there who seem to think there's no problem when their children are anti social - either thinking that it doesn't matter or that "that's what kids are like." Neither is true. All children like to be pleasant to be with - we are, after all, social beings. But it takes a long term for children to learn how to be social - and longer for some than for others!

However.... everyone has different parameters here - and that's where the confusion can start. I think that tiny children who are shy should not be expected to say thank you etc - but that it is quite right for the parent to say it to the person for them. As they get a little older, you could start to whisper to them (perhaps bending down to them "shall I thank Granma for the present or will you?" Or - "Let's thank Granma together" and playfully trying to do it.) Sensitive adults should see that your children are shy - but I do think it's important that they are seen as participating in good manners in some way - it could be that you pick each one up as you thank the person - they are thus participating via you.

I think the whole kissing and hugging issue is very sensitive and very difficult. Part of me (despite a part Jewish part Italian very huggy and kissy family) thinks it's awful to submit children to that ordeal. On the other hand, on the rare occasions when I brought my sons (brought up in the UK where people stand about a mile apart when expressing gladness to see each other) to NYC to see the family, I figured it wouldn't kill them to be kissed and hugged and thrown around and generally passed from hand to hand by my enthusiastic relatives. OK - they were a bit shocked by the end of it - but they survived - and they learned something about the other side of their family.

So there's a lot of cultural issues here - very hard to navigate.

As for the play thing.... stop talking and start doing!! You need to keep them fairly close during those times that such squabbles are most likely to develop and get right in there and show them how to play. Remove the toy from the offender. Give it back to the one who had it stolen. Take the offender away from the situation and go peel carrots with her in the kitchen. Accompany her back and hand her a new toy - if she insists on the old toy, take her back to the kitchen. If she cries and screams - let her. It is ok for children to cry. There's a bit of an AP (attachment parenting) thing against crying which sneaks in, inappropriately, to the post-baby years. Letting a baby cry it out in a crib - I also could never do that and don't think it's healthy. But as the child grows, if she needs to cry out of frustration or anger, that's ok. She has no other way to express herself - and does not need another way until she grows into an ability to start to express her feelings - and that kind of self awareness should not come at such an early age. Many of us fear our children's strong emotions, feeling somehow we are failing them if they rage or cry. Thus so many parents try their hardest to teach their children various skills so that they can speak and name their feelings. But I would say that this is actually far more harmful than letting the child cry or rage. By bringing her precociously into self awareness (which is  what one needs in able to name ones feelings) then one is shortening the pre intellectual stage of consciousness of the young child, the stage of oneness where there is no true sense of "I". These are the years of working and learning via the physical body - and physical responses from the child such as crying and screaming are part of that.

As for the whole apologizing for hitting her sister thing, I would just say simply but firmly to the child in such situations "No - that's not ok." Remove her. Then later on, help her do something nice for her sister (redemption - always redemption). At 3 1/2 she is too young to do this on her own. So you say "We're going to draw a nice picture for your sister. She felt bad before when you hit her." No recriminations, no guilt, no therapy-speak, no fuss. Simple fact - this happened, this how we make it better. Even if she does not cooperate - you do it. You are still powerfully connected to your little ones and what you do influences them. You give the other child the picture in the "offender's " presence - and in her hearing say "This is a card from X. " You don't even need to explain. They know.

I think part of your quandary, Member X, might be a missing piece from the modeling/ discussion thing - it's the physical aspect. Little ones need to be picked up, handled, moved from one place to another, removed from situations, held when they scream etc etc. This is scary - and hard. But without it, one is forced into discussion with them - and we all know how useless that is. And you have discovered the limitations of modeling - it is important what we do, but when the child is in a state of anger, is out of herself, she can no longer copy our behavior. She needs the parent to provide a physical response.
__________________

Serious Threat to Homeschooling in CA

Just the other day a homeschooler in California alerted me to the fact that homeschooling is under attack in CA. She also shared her concerns over the possibility of pre school education being mandatory for all children of 4 years of age and up. I haven't heard any more on this last possibility, but this morning my husband shared the following article from the San Francisco Chronicle about serious threats to homeschooling. Those of us who have always had real concerns about accepting money from the State for homeschooling have watched the developments in the CA charter school movement with concern over the years. As a "curriculum provider"  we at Christopherus have seen increasing bureaucracy crowd into the lives of many CA homeschoolers - and have shaken our heads and murmured "what the State gives, the State can take away....." One year our publications are deemed acceptable - the next year some little person in an office (and without ever talking to us) has decided they are unacceptable.
 
So it unfortunately does not come as a surprise to us that this is happening in California. Now the task is not to say "I told you so" but for all of us homeschoolers to come together and protect our rights as citizens and parents and ensure that homeschooling is one among many choices in the supposedly free US of A.
 
Unfortunately..... as is usually the case.... in the particular case referred to in this article, it could well be that the parents were negligent and that homeschooling was just a fancy way of saying "doing nothing with the children." These things happen. But just because there are some people who do not have the wherewithal to care properly for their children's education it does not follow that education should then only be in the hands of certified teachers. To argue that would be akin to arguing that because some parents abuse their children, children should only be raised in state run institutions (it's for their protection, dearie!).
 
Freedoms have to come with responsibility and with vigilance. If some people are unable to cope, then others need to step in and help. Families which are suffering need support in their communities. People need to be free to decide how to run their lives even if they do not meet up to current standards of acceptabilty. And if choosing to homeschool - for whatever reason - is part of that, then so be it. In a free society we need to be free to mess up and fail just as we need to be free to succeed and triumph. For some people, the path is rockier than for others. The logistics of protecting children might then indeed be a bit harder - but is the alternative so much better?
 
I strongly encourage all of you, in every state (and in every country) to join your local secular state-wide (province wide etc) homeschooling organization and get involved in the campaigns to create fair homeschooling laws. The law in California has in the past been intepreted in one way - now, in this particular case, a judge has turned that ruling on its head with important implications for homeschoolers. It is up to homeschoolers and lovers of freedom to ensure that in Californa (and elsewhere) fair laws are passed concerning the education of children, homeschooling or not.
 
Anyway, here's the article. It might give some of you pause for thought to consider the words of the judge when he sings the praises of the reasons for public education....